TickerWorth Open the interactive view →

SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) — Valuation Snapshot

Updated Nov 10, 2026 · REIT · FFO, book-value and yield view · descriptive, not a DCF, not advice

This is a REIT. A free-cash-flow DCF is structurally the wrong lens for property: heavy depreciation and continuous property capex swamp reported free cash flow, which is why REITs are valued on FFO/AFFO, net asset value and dividend yield. We show those lenses instead of a DCF number we would not stand behind.
Price
$190.35
Market cap
$19,877,869,568
52-week high
$224.46
52-week low
$156.60
Currency
USD
Exchange
NasdaqGS

SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) is a real-estate investment trust, and a free-cash-flow discounted-cash-flow (DCF) model is structurally the wrong lens for one. A REIT's reported free cash flow is swamped by property depreciation and the continuous capital spending that maintaining a portfolio requires, which is why the industry is valued on funds from operations (FFO/AFFO), net asset value and dividend yield instead. We have the data to print a DCF number for SBAC; we don't publish one because it would not mean what it appears to mean. What follows is how a REIT is actually read — descriptive, not a valuation, and not investment advice.

On the numbers we do have, SBAC trades at a recent price of $190.35, a market capitalisation of about $19,877,869,568, sitting 50% of the way up its 52-week range ($156.60–$224.46), on the NasdaqGS.

The standard alternative to a DCF is relative valuation — comparing SBAC's trading multiples against a sector benchmark. Here that gives P/E of 20.6× (cheaper than the peer median of 28.0×); Fwd P/E of 24.0× (cheaper than the peer median of 36.2×); P/S of 7.0× (cheaper than the peer median of 10.3×); EV/EBITDA of 19.1× (in line with the peer median of 19.9×); Dividend yield of 2.6% (richer than the peer median of 3.8%). A cheaper multiple than peers can flag a discount or a market that expects weaker growth; it is a comparison, not a recommendation.

Finally, a price-based read — explicitly not a valuation. SBAC is in a mixed trend, trading -15.2% from its 52-week high. Over the past year the stock is -5.0%. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded; they say nothing about what it is worth.

To be exact about what this page is not: we are not saying the numbers for SBAC are unavailable. They are, and they are above. We are saying a discounted-cash-flow model is the wrong instrument for this kind of business, and publishing one anyway — because the inputs happen to exist — would be a precise answer to the wrong question. Refusing is the more useful answer, and it is the same rule we apply to every name in this category.

Relative valuation — SBAC vs peers

MultipleSBACPeer median
P/E20.6×28.0×cheaper than
Fwd P/E24.0×36.2×cheaper than
P/S7.0×10.3×cheaper than
EV/EBITDA19.1×19.9×in line with
Dividend yield2.6%3.8%richer than

Sector benchmark (bellwethers, not direct competitors).

Asset / book-value view

We are not showing a price-to-book for this listing: the book value we have does not belong to the same share class as the price, so any ratio of the two would be arithmetic rather than a valuation.

Price-based snapshot

50-day avg
$179.80
200-day avg
$190.32
From 52-wk high
-15.2%
1-year momentum
-5.0%

Price-based, not a valuation. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded — they say nothing about fair value.

Explore more

Most undervalued stocks (per our valuation) · All valued stocks · Interactive SBAC view

A descriptive, available-data snapshot and relative comparison — NOT a DCF, NOT a price target, and NOT investment advice. TickerWorth is an educational tool, not a licensed investment adviser. Figures are estimates derived from public market data and can be wrong, stale or incomplete.