Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) — Valuation Snapshot
Updated Nov 10, 2026 · REIT · FFO, book-value and yield view · descriptive, not a DCF, not advice
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) is a real-estate investment trust, and a free-cash-flow discounted-cash-flow (DCF) model is structurally the wrong lens for one. A REIT's reported free cash flow is swamped by property depreciation and the continuous capital spending that maintaining a portfolio requires, which is why the industry is valued on funds from operations (FFO/AFFO), net asset value and dividend yield instead. We have the data to print a DCF number for PK; we don't publish one because it would not mean what it appears to mean. What follows is how a REIT is actually read — descriptive, not a valuation, and not investment advice.
On the numbers we do have, PK trades at a recent price of $16.46, a market capitalisation of about $3,326,271,744, sitting 91% of the way up its 52-week range ($9.84–$17.14), on the NYSE.
The standard alternative to a DCF is relative valuation — comparing PK's trading multiples against a sector benchmark. Here that gives Fwd P/E of 23.7× (cheaper than the peer median of 36.2×); P/B of 1.1× (cheaper than the peer median of 7.2×); P/S of 1.3× (cheaper than the peer median of 10.3×); EV/EBITDA of 12.1× (cheaper than the peer median of 19.9×); Dividend yield of 6.1% (cheaper than the peer median of 3.8%). A cheaper multiple than peers can flag a discount or a market that expects weaker growth; it is a comparison, not a recommendation.
The asset, or book-value, lens is the classic tool for asset-heavy businesses and financials. PK shows a price-to-book (P/B) of 1.10 and book value of $14.96 per share. Price-to-book compares the market price to the accounting net-asset value per share; below 1.0 can mean a discount to net assets or that the market is pricing in trouble — descriptive either way, never a buy signal on its own.
Finally, a price-based read — explicitly not a valuation. PK is in an up-trend (price above both its 50- and 200-day averages), trading -4.0% from its 52-week high. Over the past year the stock is +46.1%. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded; they say nothing about what it is worth.
To be exact about what this page is not: we are not saying the numbers for PK are unavailable. They are, and they are above. We are saying a discounted-cash-flow model is the wrong instrument for this kind of business, and publishing one anyway — because the inputs happen to exist — would be a precise answer to the wrong question. Refusing is the more useful answer, and it is the same rule we apply to every name in this category.
Relative valuation — PK vs peers
| Multiple | PK | Peer median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fwd P/E | 23.7× | 36.2× | cheaper than |
| P/B | 1.1× | 7.2× | cheaper than |
| P/S | 1.3× | 10.3× | cheaper than |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.1× | 19.9× | cheaper than |
| Dividend yield | 6.1% | 3.8% | cheaper than |
Sector benchmark (bellwethers, not direct competitors).
Asset / book-value view
Price-to-book compares the market price to the accounting net-asset value per share. Most useful for asset-heavy businesses, banks and insurers.
Price-based snapshot
Price-based, not a valuation. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded — they say nothing about fair value.
Explore more
Most undervalued stocks (per our valuation) · All valued stocks · Interactive PK viewA descriptive, available-data snapshot and relative comparison — NOT a DCF, NOT a price target, and NOT investment advice. TickerWorth is an educational tool, not a licensed investment adviser. Figures are estimates derived from public market data and can be wrong, stale or incomplete.