PG&E Corporation (PCG) — Valuation Snapshot
Updated Nov 10, 2026 · rate-regulated utility · book-value and yield view · descriptive, not a DCF, not advice
PG&E Corporation (PCG) is a rate-regulated utility, and a free-cash-flow discounted-cash-flow (DCF) model is structurally the wrong lens for one. Its returns are not won in a market — a regulator sets them on an approved rate base — and the heavy, permanent capital spending that depresses its free cash flow is the business model rather than a problem with it. We have the data to print a DCF number for PCG; we don't publish one because the model's assumptions don't describe how this company actually earns. What follows is the lenses that do — descriptive, not a valuation, and not investment advice.
On the numbers we do have, PCG trades at a recent price of $13.14, a market capitalisation of about $28,939,927,552, sitting 19% of the way up its 52-week range ($11.77–$19.16), on the NYSE.
The standard alternative to a DCF is relative valuation — comparing PCG's trading multiples against a sector benchmark. Here that gives P/E of 9.7× (cheaper than the peer median of 21.0×); Fwd P/E of 7.3× (cheaper than the peer median of 18.6×); P/B of 0.9× (cheaper than the peer median of 2.1×); P/S of 1.1× (cheaper than the peer median of 3.1×); EV/EBITDA of 8.9× (cheaper than the peer median of 13.3×); Dividend yield of 1.5% (richer than the peer median of 3.2%). A cheaper multiple than peers can flag a discount or a market that expects weaker growth; it is a comparison, not a recommendation.
The asset, or book-value, lens is the classic tool for asset-heavy businesses and financials. PCG shows a price-to-book (P/B) of 0.88 and book value of $14.98 per share. Price-to-book compares the market price to the accounting net-asset value per share; below 1.0 can mean a discount to net assets or that the market is pricing in trouble — descriptive either way, never a buy signal on its own.
Finally, a price-based read — explicitly not a valuation. PCG is in a down-trend (price below both its 50- and 200-day averages), trading -31.4% from its 52-week high. Over the past year the stock is -21.7%. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded; they say nothing about what it is worth.
To be exact about what this page is not: we are not saying the numbers for PCG are unavailable. They are, and they are above. We are saying a discounted-cash-flow model is the wrong instrument for this kind of business, and publishing one anyway — because the inputs happen to exist — would be a precise answer to the wrong question. Refusing is the more useful answer, and it is the same rule we apply to every name in this category.
Relative valuation — PCG vs peers
| Multiple | PCG | Peer median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 9.7× | 21.0× | cheaper than |
| Fwd P/E | 7.3× | 18.6× | cheaper than |
| P/B | 0.9× | 2.1× | cheaper than |
| P/S | 1.1× | 3.1× | cheaper than |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.9× | 13.3× | cheaper than |
| Dividend yield | 1.5% | 3.2% | richer than |
Sector benchmark (bellwethers, not direct competitors).
Asset / book-value view
Below book (P/B < 1) can flag either a discount to net assets or the market pricing in trouble — it is descriptive, not a buy signal.
Price-based snapshot
Price-based, not a valuation. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded — they say nothing about fair value.
Explore more
Most undervalued stocks (per our valuation) · All valued stocks · Interactive PCG viewA descriptive, available-data snapshot and relative comparison — NOT a DCF, NOT a price target, and NOT investment advice. TickerWorth is an educational tool, not a licensed investment adviser. Figures are estimates derived from public market data and can be wrong, stale or incomplete.